Ben Thompson Xtuple Open Source Erp For Mac
Posted : admin On 03.03.2020
The obvious: why Taiwan? My guess is that it's to be as far away from the companies he writes about as is possible. Another possibility is that the future of tech is in China, and he wants to be close to it. It's become conventional wisdom that the culture in Silicon Valley is stagnant, reason enough to avoid the place. See this piece by Farhad Manjoo about Jessica Powell's new 'fiction' set in Silicon Valley: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/technology/silicon-valleys-keystone-problem-a-monoculture-of-thought.html. I'd ask Ben something like: Twitter provides me with wonderful insight into the thoughts and lives of many technologists, particularly those with minor celebrity status in the Apple world (such as John Gruber, who was the person who originally introduced me to your writing via Daring Fireball).
It brings me great joy to have insight into the developers that make my daily Mac and iPhone experience so wonderful, but it is hard not to feel like Peter Thiel sometimes regard to the community's monoculture when it comes to the political realm or topics like what is solvable by regulation (or whether regulation can ever be problematic). My tech list on Twitter is generally the most overtly left-wing of anyone I follow. Your analyses on many of the same topics they'll be talking about (Net Neutrality, social media regulation, etc) always seem to stand out as more self-reflective/non-absolutist in comparison. Do you ever feel similarly about your position? Given they all read your writing too, why do you think they are not more skeptical, and what if anything do you do personally to keep your own biases from leaking into your analysis, and world view? 'Why haven't American technology companies entered financial services?'
But they have; indeed, 'FinTech' is a thing. From mobile payments to insurance, they have been making inroads in some of the most profitable elements of the financial services value chain. It's just not a 'bank' in the traditional sense. According to a PWC survey, financial services industry respondents said that a quarter of their business, or more, could be at risk of being lost to standalone FinTech companies within 5 years. Now, bringing 'disruption' to the financial services industry is not without risk. And I'm not sure we are ready for it. And you think social media is risky.
Ben Thompson Xtuple Open Source Erp For Mac Mac
Ben Thompson appears to be in the GDP is mismeasured for internet goods school, rather than the great stagnation school. Is this an intuition, which might be changed with more reading, or something he feels confident on?
To make this more concrete and provocative, would he argue the mismeasurement of our own era is worse than, say, when vaccines were introduced in the early 1900s, which stopped 40% of kids dying before age 5? As media flips from 80% revenue ads/20% subs, to 20% revenue ads/80% subs, should we expect the media to 'follow the money', and cater to the desires of their audience more cravenly? Is the solution to this not to enforce a 'view from nowhere', but instead encourage more diverse media outlets and let them fight it out? Or should we attempt to recapture the Walter Cronkite view from monopoly?
Ben Thompson Xtuple Open Source Erp For Mac Download
Tyler has said he gets much of his new input from reader email. Ben is now at audience scale, so he also likely gets most his input/feedback from readers too. What are the pros of this? What are the cons (eg, self-reinforcing systematic bias)? Free game making software for mac. Any steps taken to optimize your reader input in terms of daily workflow (how much time spent reading audience feedback, versus browsing outside internet)? Ben cut way back on his twitter usage a few years ago.
How much of this was driven by productivity concerns? How much by the troll problem, which became far more severe as he went from 1k, to 5k, to 10k, to 50k, to now nearly 100k followers? What NBA player active today is most likely to have a conversation with Tyler? That is to say, have an intellectual post NBA career similar to Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (who I believe is the only NBA player to have done a conversation with Tyler)?
How widely used are PEDS in the NBA by the biggest superstars? (my guess is Ben doesn't think it's a big problem, but I suspect that's incorrect, but who knows for sure, that's why I'm curious to ask him) 6. Do you foresee Stratechery shifting it's focus away from pure tech and more towards government policy over the next 5 years? This may be natural as software eats more industries, such as transportation and healthcare. Ben appears to follow sports.more. closely now that he is more successful. Is this because he now can afford to do so?
Or because sports is a safer outlet (eg NoTechBen) for someone with a high profile, and so on the margin he spends more time there? (ed note, this beats the Elon Musk approach).
Who do Tyrone and NoTechBen pick as likeliest to beat the Warriors, if not this season, in the next few seasons? Why did none of the big five banks in the US do exactly what Stripe and Square are doing? Do Stripe, Square and the other start-ups in the payments (online and real world) and associated small-business services industry have any durable advantage over, say, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, B of A etc.? Or were the start-ups just a bit ahead of the curve in realizing that a seamless customer experience had value? Do you read any academic economists (besides Clay Christensen) or academic economics papers or journals? Do you find any of their work to be as useful as the writings or practitioners when it comes to understanding the technology industries and strategy?
What is missing from academic economics writing and theory that would make it more useful for a strategist, investor or manager in technology? What do you learn from academic economists that you could not have learned from discussions with business-people, managers and investors in technology? In 1947 John Van Neumann and a team at the Institute of Advanced Theoretical Research built the first modern computer. Because of this, neither Univac nor IBM could ever patent the basic design (Van Neumann architecture) and concepts that would up underlying all modern computers. In the seventies the Pentagon forced Intel to license their instruction set to AMD to ensure a second source.
Because of that no company ever had a monopoly on the underlying instructions and languages of modern computing. If, arguendo, these instances show that sometimes markets and industries grow faster and technologies progress more quickly when core ideas or technologies are not subject to patent or monopoly; how would you go about rigorously identifying when, where and how specific interventions or reductions in particular companies IP or monopoly status would be good for future competition and progress? Is it, or might it be the case that market interventions to improve growth are like Alan Greenspan's bubbles- we can only definitely identify them in retrospect?
Or is there a methodology that can identify them in real time? Synergy is an oft-mocked concept; but Amazon seems to be evolving towards a conglomerate business model with several unprofitable units or second-rate divisions justified by the synergy they provide or gain from AWS and/or Prime.
If you were an analyst how would you sort out whether Amazon/Whole Foods/Amazon Fresh/Zappos/Alexa/Amazon Music etc. Should be credited with a synergy premium or a conglomerate discount in a sum-of-the-parts valuation? Capital investment can be subsidized, manufacturing processes can be copied. Is there anything besides those that prevents Chinese semiconductor companies from competing globally? Will the reported $100 billion in government funds available to stimulate the domestic industry succeed or is that likely to be money down the drain?
In Taiwan, what writers/teachers of business management or strategy are taken seriously? How is this different than in the US and why? Same question about mainland China. There are countries like Brazil that produce very few internationally competitive companies but lots of internationally successful executives and countries like South Korea that have lots of internationally competitive companies but almost no executives who go on to successfully manage anything outside their home country. Why does Taiwan succeed at both? What is Taiwan doing differently than Korea or is it just path dependence and coincidence?
The Stripe/Square/Adyen question comes down to both regulation and the shape of the organizations: Those companies choose to not be banks on purpose, as they believe the regulatory losses will outweigh the means. They are not the only ones that think that either: Look at how many new bank charters have been granted in the US in the last decade. The organizational differences are also very stark: Competition among profitable clients is not just about ease of use of the simplest of cases, but about more and more features.
Making it easy to use payment systems all over the world, charge in every currency imaginable, support those payments in retail payment systems, and automation of things that would be hard for new startups, like subscriptions and marketplaces, contacts with banks all over the place. The speed at which those companies move, and the number of features they provide, are really hard to meet given how software is built in a bank, full of very long project plans, or, at best, flaccid agile practices. It's just far easier for the banks to stop trying to do any of that work, and just take their rather large share from each transaction, at least as long as those payments companies avoid making hostile moves against banks. How does think about India and tech sector. Software has been a major contribution to India in the past two decades. Will it be able to sustain a significant role in the software world? Is India uniquely positioned to implement a labor-intensive model of software development?
Some people say that augmented reality is the next big leap after smartphones. Does he agree? Why or why not? Andy Clark and David Chalmers have the extended mind hypothesis. Smartphones are a good candidate for mind extensions. Does he think that they have made humans smarter? Overrated/underrated: Venture capitalists and founders as intellectuals.
Software bloat. As hardware becomes better and better, it seems that software is becoming worse and worse. Does he see this trending coming to a stop somewhere? Which company/sector/community writes the best software? How does he view the interaction between academic computer science/engineering/science and industry? Is academia underrated or overrated for the tech sector?
Your sister podcast Exponent was a stupendous product and a great way to tease out thoughts from the week’s posts. Do you have plans to bring it back? What is one habit that has made the most difference in your life and why?
What do you not know, that you wish you did? Have you considered putting together a yearly event where you could interview tech execs and have subscribers attend? It would be a great service for subscribers (networking, learning) and broaden your knowledge and influence. I know you’re not strictly motivated by money, but I also hear that conferences are very lucrative. If you could waive a magic wand and change one thing about Facebook, Alphabet or Amazon, what would it be? Aggregation theory underpins a lot of your prescriptions for possible regulatory action.
It doesn’t seem that regulators are familiar with the theory—certainly not in Europe! Why do you think that is, and does it frustrate you that European legislators are still looking at the world through the rear view mirror? You once wrote a piece explained that the face is not the future, meaning a virtual reality headset you wear at home is constraining and certainly not the path forward.
As we move to a world of portable AR/VR headsets in a few years (if Oculus’s Mike Abrash is to be believed), do you think such a device would have a chance to be a real computing platform? You have talked about your superpowers (sleep little, read fast, great memory). But if you could choose one more, what would it be? Lastly, what is it going to take to get James to watch Her?